Some of all of our foregoing considerations promote credence towards the assertion you to definitely metaphor are an enthusiastic analogous term. This can be corroborated of the St Thomas’ techniques involved thirteen regarding new Prima Pars , once the during the blog post three, when he asks if any name’s told you securely regarding God, the brand new resistance lead into the play is between usage proprie and improprie with the latter identified which have metaphor. Next, within the post half dozen, when he requires if names well-known so you’re able to Jesus and you may animals is actually first said away from creatures, this new difference proprie/improprie seems to be a great subdivision regarding analogous name. St Thomas begins because of the proclaiming that “within the omnibus nominibus quae de- pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur for every single respectum advertisement unum: mais aussi ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur within the definitione omnium. Mais aussi quia ratio quam significat nomen each prius dicitur de- eo quod ponitur from inside the definitione aliorum, et for each posterius de- aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant offer illud primum vel magis vel minus.” This will be exemplified by the old credible, “match.” “Sic thus omni nomina quae metaphorice de Deo dicuntur for every single prius de- creaturis dicuntur quam de- Deo: quia dicta de Deo, nihil aliud high quam similitudines offer tales creaturas.” St. Thomas observes the latest similarity regarding proportion ( similitudo proportionum ) required into the “smiling meadow” as well as in getting in touch with Jesus a good lion.

When he continues on to speak away from other labels “quae non metaphorice dicuntur de Deo,” the new clear impact is the fact they are talking regarding most other occasions out of analogous brands than simply metaphors

Have there been messages where St Thomas opposes metaphor and you will analogy? If we seek out brand new statements to your Metaphysics , we discover St Thomas identifying “potency” to your analogous and you may equivocal modes. “Potency” means several things. “Sed ista multiplicitas quantum advertising quosdam analogiae.” The equivocal methods regarding effectiveness is actually exemplified by the way we talk about 3 on 3rd strength and of the newest cube because the electricity of your own range. “Ainsi que propter hoc for every quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens within the quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens within the rem” Once again an excellent proportionality observe. Why these equivocal modes really are metaphors is obvious regarding the synchronous passing in-book Delta during the leaving comments about what St Thomas begins, “Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.” Why are such modes metaphorical and never analogical? “Their thus modis praetermissis, considerandum est de potentiis, quae reducuntur advertising unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, et omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur ad aliquid principium ex lover quo omnes aliae dicuntur.” In short, St Thomas right here opposes metaphor in order to analogous spends from a reputation due to the fact second and never the former include a decrease in order to what is mostly denominated from the phrase at issue while, should they you need pointing out, throughout the text of your own Summa we believed the next back, this new metaphor wasn’t well known throughout the expansion proprie on this subject basis. Or is they the way book review essay writing services in which of mention of what is principally signifed by the term and therefore distinguishes metaphor from example, use proprie away from improprie ? One thing entitled metaphorically is actually, whatsoever, delivered to be similar to just what label safely signifies.

What we should are wanting is some technique for justifying the quite preferred improvement out of metaphor and you will example such that no interest was designed to Cajetan’s section out-of analogy with the attribution and you may proper proportionality

A keen aporia has certainly came up, therefore, and its own quality can simply become had by choosing just what good metaphor is actually and exactly what an enthusiastic analogous name is. Answers to such concerns is to enable me to understand the apparently conflicting comments off Aquinas.